[linux-cifs] Re: [PATCH] Complete oplock break jobs before closing file handle


On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Sachin Prabhu  wrote:
> Commit
> c11f1df5003d534fd067f0168bfad7befffb3b5c
> requires writers to wait for any pending oplock break handler to
> complete before proceeding to write. This is done by waiting on bit
> CIFS_INODE_PENDING_OPLOCK_BREAK in cifsFileInfo->flags. This bit is
> cleared by the oplock break handler job queued on the workqueue once it
> has completed handling the oplock break allowing writers to proceed with
> writing to the file.
>
> While testing, it was noticed that the filehandle could be closed while
> there is a pending oplock break which results in the oplock break
> handler on the cifsiod workqueue being cancelled before it has had a
> chance to execute and clear the CIFS_INODE_PENDING_OPLOCK_BREAK bit.
> Any subsequent attempt to write to this file hangs waiting for the
> CIFS_INODE_PENDING_OPLOCK_BREAK bit to be cleared.
>
> We fix this by ensuring that we also clear the bit
> CIFS_INODE_PENDING_OPLOCK_BREAK when we remove the oplock break handler
> from the workqueue.
>
> The bug was found by Red Hat QA while testing using ltp's fsstress
> command.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Prabhu 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton 
> ---
>  fs/cifs/file.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> index 96b7e9b..74f1287 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> @@ -366,6 +366,7 @@ void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
>         struct cifsLockInfo *li, *tmp;
>         struct cifs_fid fid;
>         struct cifs_pending_open open;
> +       bool oplock_break_cancelled;
>
>         spin_lock(&cifs_file_list_lock);
>         if (--cifs_file->count > 0) {
> @@ -397,7 +398,7 @@ void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
>         }
>         spin_unlock(&cifs_file_list_lock);
>
> -       cancel_work_sync(&cifs_file->oplock_break);
> +       oplock_break_cancelled = cancel_work_sync(&cifs_file->oplock_break);
>
>         if (!tcon->need_reconnect && !cifs_file->invalidHandle) {
>                 struct TCP_Server_Info *server = tcon->ses->server;
> @@ -409,6 +410,9 @@ void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
>                 _free_xid(xid);
>         }
>
> +       if (oplock_break_cancelled)
> +               cifs_done_oplock_break(cifsi);
> +
>         cifs_del_pending_open(&open);
>
>         /*
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Does it matter what cancel_work_sync() returns?
Should cifs_done_oplock_break(cifsi); be called unconditionally?
Also, should this also to go stable?

This message from: http://www.mailbrowse.com/linux-cifs/10423.html
Previous message: Re: [linux-cifs-client] [PATCH] cifs: hard mount option behaviour implementation
Next message:Re: [PATCH] Complete oplock break jobs before closing file handle